Advancing Validity In Outcome Evaluation Theory And Practice Chen by Chen, Huey-tsyh; Donaldson, Stewart I. (stewart Ian); Mark, Melvin M; American Evaluation Association instant download after payment.

123 pages : 23 cm, Chapter authors present multiple views on how to build on the Campbellian typology's contribution or suggest alternative validity frameworks or models to serve program evaluation better, \"A publication of Jossey-Bass and the American Evaluation Association\"--Cover, \"Summer 2011.\", Includes bibliographical references and index, Editors' notes / Huey T. Chen, Stewart I. Donaldson, Melvin M. Mark -- Validity frameworks for outcome evaluation / Huey T. Chen, Stewart I. Donaldson, Melvin M. Mark -- What works for whom, where, why, for what, and when?: using evaluation evidence to take action in local contexts / John Gargani, Stewart I. Donaldson -- New (and old) directions for validity concerning generalizability / Melvin M. Mark -- Criticisms of and an alternative to the Shadish, Cook, and Campbell validity typology / Charles S. Reichardt -- Reframing validity in research and evaluation: a multidimensional, systematic model of valid inference / George Julnes -- Conflict of interest and Campbellian validity / Ernest R. House -- The construct(ion) of validity as argument / Jennifer C. Greene -- Assessing program outcomes from the bottom-up approach: an innovative perspective to outcome evaluation / Huey T. Chen, Paul Garbe -- The truth about validity / William R. Shadish