EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

A Big Apple For Educators New York Citys Experiment With Schoolwide Performance Bonuses Final Evaluation Report Julie A Marsh

SKU: BELL-2415102

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

0 reviews

A Big Apple For Educators New York Citys Experiment With Schoolwide Performance Bonuses Final Evaluation Report Julie A Marsh instant download after payment.

Publisher: Rand Corporation

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.6 MB

Pages: 314

Author: Julie A. Marsh, Matthew G. Springer, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Kun Yuan, Scott Epstein, Julia Koppich, Nidhi Kalra, Catherine DiMartino, Art Peng

ISBN: 9780833052513, 0833052519

Language: English

Year: 2011

Product desciption

A Big Apple For Educators New York Citys Experiment With Schoolwide Performance Bonuses Final Evaluation Report Julie A Marsh by Julie A. Marsh, Matthew G. Springer, Daniel F. Mccaffrey, Kun Yuan, Scott Epstein, Julia Koppich, Nidhi Kalra, Catherine Dimartino, Art Peng 9780833052513, 0833052519 instant download after payment.

For three school years, from 2007 to 2010, about 200 high-needs New York City public schools participated in the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program, whose broad objective was to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives. An independent analysis of test scores, surveys, and interviews found that the program did not improve student achievement, perhaps because it did not motivate change in educator behavior.