logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

A Commentary On The Rhesus Attributed To Euripides 1st Edition Vaios Liaps

  • SKU: BELL-58444996
A Commentary On The Rhesus Attributed To Euripides 1st Edition Vaios Liaps
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

108 reviews

A Commentary On The Rhesus Attributed To Euripides 1st Edition Vaios Liaps instant download after payment.

Publisher: Oxford University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 3.33 MB
Author: Vaios Liapēs, Vayos Liapis
ISBN: 9780199591688, 0199591687
Language: English
Year: 2012
Edition: 1

Product desciption

A Commentary On The Rhesus Attributed To Euripides 1st Edition Vaios Liaps by Vaios Liapēs, Vayos Liapis 9780199591688, 0199591687 instant download after payment.

Rhesus, a tragedy traditionally (but wrongly) attributed to Euripides, has been the object of too little scholarly attention over the last decades. While debate has focused largely on the question of the play's authenticity, consequently overlooking the features of the play itself, this important new commentary explores the essential elements such as language, style, character-portrayal, and metre. The play's stagecraft and plot-construction are scrutinized and shown to be generally idiosyncratic and often defective despite occasional flashes of genius in the handling of dramatic time and theatrical space. Through the detailed introduction, translation, and commentary, Liapis shows that Rhesus is largely derivative, as it contains a significant amount of textual material taken from other classical tragedies and genres. The conclusion is that the contested author's familiarity with fifth-century drama bespeaks a professional actor, probably one specializing in re-performances of classical repertoire. Such evidence suggests that Rhesus can therefore be considered as not only a surviving fourth-century tragedy, but also one conceived for performance outside of Athens.

Related Products