logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

A Constitutionalist Approach To The European Convention On Human Rights The Legitimacy Of Evolutive And Static Interpretation Lisa Sonnleitner

  • SKU: BELL-50227402
A Constitutionalist Approach To The European Convention On Human Rights The Legitimacy Of Evolutive And Static Interpretation Lisa Sonnleitner
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

0.0

0 reviews

A Constitutionalist Approach To The European Convention On Human Rights The Legitimacy Of Evolutive And Static Interpretation Lisa Sonnleitner instant download after payment.

Publisher: Hart Publishing
File Extension: PDF
File size: 7.36 MB
Author: Lisa Sonnleitner
ISBN: 9781509946877, 9781509946907, 150994687X, 150994690X
Language: English
Year: 2022

Product desciption

A Constitutionalist Approach To The European Convention On Human Rights The Legitimacy Of Evolutive And Static Interpretation Lisa Sonnleitner by Lisa Sonnleitner 9781509946877, 9781509946907, 150994687X, 150994690X instant download after payment.

This book presents a new constitutional argument for the legitimacy of evolutive interpretation of the ECHR. It constructs a model, in which evolutive and static constitutional principles are balanced with each other.
The author argues that there are three possible interpretive approaches in timesensitive interpretations of the ECHR, but that only one of them is justifiable by reference to the constitutional principles of the ECHR in every single case.
The ECHR’s constitutional principles either require an evolutive or static interpretation or they do not establish a preference relation at all, which leads to a margin of appreciation of the member states in the interpretation of the Convention. The balancing model requires the determination of the weights of the competing evolutive and static constitutional principles. For this purpose, the author defines weighting factors for determining the importance of evolutive or static interpretation in a concrete case.
Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory: Volume 3

Related Products