logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

A Pragmatic Analysis Of Legal Proofs Of Criminal Intent Sol Azuelosatias

  • SKU: BELL-1680524
A Pragmatic Analysis Of Legal Proofs Of Criminal Intent Sol Azuelosatias
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

66 reviews

A Pragmatic Analysis Of Legal Proofs Of Criminal Intent Sol Azuelosatias instant download after payment.

Publisher: John Benjamins
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.03 MB
Pages: 180
Author: Sol Azuelos-Atias
ISBN: 9789027227164, 9789027292155, 9027227160, 9027292159
Language: English
Year: 2007

Product desciption

A Pragmatic Analysis Of Legal Proofs Of Criminal Intent Sol Azuelosatias by Sol Azuelos-atias 9789027227164, 9789027292155, 9027227160, 9027292159 instant download after payment.

A Pragmatic Analysis of Legal Proofs of Criminal Intent is a detailed investigation of proofs of criminal intent in Israeli courtrooms. The book analyses linguistic, pragmatic, interpretative and argumentative strategies used by Israeli lawyers and judges in order to examine the defendant’s intention. There can be no doubt that this subject is worthy of a thorough investigation. A person’s intention is a psychological phenomenon and therefore, unless the defendant chooses to confess his intent, it cannot be proven directly – either by evidence or by witnesses’ testimonies. The defendant’s intention must be inferred usually from the overall circumstances of the case; verbal and situational contexts, cultural and ideological assumptions and implicatures should be taken into account. The linguistic analysis of these inferences presented here is necessarily comprehensive: it requires consideration of a variety of theoretical frameworks including speech act theory, discourse analysis, argumentation theory, polyphony theory and text linguistics.

Related Products