EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Aporetics Rational Deliberation In The Face Of Inconsistency Rescher

Name: Aporetics Rational Deliberation In The Face Of Inconsistency Rescher
SKU: BELL-5161104
Price: 31.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4 (56 reviews)

SKU: BELL-5161104

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

4.0

56 reviews

Aporetics Rational Deliberation In The Face Of Inconsistency Rescher instant download after payment.

Publisher: University of Pittsburgh Press

File Extension: PDF

File size: 3.5 MB

Pages: 176

Author: Rescher, Nicholas

ISBN: 9780822960577, 9780822973683, 0822960575, 0822973685

Language: English

Year: 2009

Product desciption

Aporetics Rational Deliberation In The Face Of Inconsistency Rescher by Rescher, Nicholas 9780822960577, 9780822973683, 0822960575, 0822973685 instant download after payment.

The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics,Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control.