logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Argumentation In The Newsroom 1st Edition Marta Zampa

  • SKU: BELL-51626164
Argumentation In The Newsroom 1st Edition Marta Zampa
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

86 reviews

Argumentation In The Newsroom 1st Edition Marta Zampa instant download after payment.

Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
File Extension: EPUB
File size: 2.87 MB
Pages: 231
Author: Marta Zampa
ISBN: 9789027264794, 9027264791
Language: English
Year: 2017
Edition: 1

Product desciption

Argumentation In The Newsroom 1st Edition Marta Zampa by Marta Zampa 9789027264794, 9027264791 instant download after payment.

The news we see daily is selected from among alternatives by journalists. Argumentation in the Newsroom uses ethnographic data from Swiss television and print newsrooms to shed light on how journalists make decisions regarding the selection and presentation of news items in their daily professional practice. The evidence illustrates that, contrary to the standard view, journalistic decisions are not limited to the influence of standardized production patterns, instinct, or editors' orders. Rather, in their attempt to produce the best news possible, journalists carefully ponder and discuss their choices, utilizing full-fledged critical discussions at all stages of the newsmaking process. By employing the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion in conjunction with the Argumentum Model of Topics, this study provides a detailed reconstruction of how journalists make use of argumentative reasoning, basing their decisions on a complex set of material premises and on recurrent procedural premises.

Related Products