Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.
Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq
We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.
For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.
EbookBell Team
5.0
90 reviewsContributions in English and French. FilmForum/2014 : XXI Convegno internazionale di studi sul cinema = XXI International Film Studies Conference: Università di Udine. Dipartimento di storia e tutela dei beni culturali.
Due to its long and interdisciplinary tradition and the international network supporting it, FilmForum is seen as one of the most relevant annual conference in Europe in the domain of film and media studies.
The XXI Udine International Film Studies Conference has been thought of as an occasion to exchange different, sometimes contrasting, views from at least three generations of film historians.
This book collects and testifies those brilliant and unpredictable outcomes. The volume is divided into five sections pivoting on five dichotomies, which want to emphasise the dialectical nature of the dialogue we attempted to dig for.
Even though media archaeology seems to be nowadays the new orthodoxy in film studies, the dialectical approach we opt for has been aimed at underlining both contrasts and incongruities to scratch the surface of an apparently well-grounded, undisputed harmony.
Surprisingly enough, the most concerned chapters with media archaeology, written by the same protagonists of this turn, are also the most critical, if not controversial, in dealing uncritically with that methodology.
At the same time, the most empiricist, traditional chapters, whose approach does not share media archaeological anxieties, nonetheless prove an underground concern with the very same issues at the heart of media archaeology debate.
