logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Balancing Constitutional Rights The Origins And Meanings Of Postwar Legal Discourse Jacco Bomhoff

  • SKU: BELL-5200410
Balancing Constitutional Rights The Origins And Meanings Of Postwar Legal Discourse Jacco Bomhoff
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.4

12 reviews

Balancing Constitutional Rights The Origins And Meanings Of Postwar Legal Discourse Jacco Bomhoff instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 5.97 MB
Pages: 290
Author: Jacco Bomhoff
ISBN: 9781107044418, 1107044413
Language: English
Year: 2014

Product desciption

Balancing Constitutional Rights The Origins And Meanings Of Postwar Legal Discourse Jacco Bomhoff by Jacco Bomhoff 9781107044418, 1107044413 instant download after payment.

The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today.

Related Products