logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Belief Revision Meets Philosophy Of Science Erik J Olsson Sebastian Enqvist Eds

  • SKU: BELL-2006494
Belief Revision Meets Philosophy Of Science Erik J Olsson Sebastian Enqvist Eds
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.7

56 reviews

Belief Revision Meets Philosophy Of Science Erik J Olsson Sebastian Enqvist Eds instant download after payment.

Publisher: Springer
File Extension: PDF
File size: 3.75 MB
Pages: 380
Author: Erik J. Olsson, Sebastian Enqvist (eds.)
ISBN: 9789048196081, 9789048196098, 9048196086, 9048196094
Language: English
Year: 2011

Product desciption

Belief Revision Meets Philosophy Of Science Erik J Olsson Sebastian Enqvist Eds by Erik J. Olsson, Sebastian Enqvist (eds.) 9789048196081, 9789048196098, 9048196086, 9048196094 instant download after payment.

Belief revision theory and philosophy of science both aspire to shed light on the dynamics of knowledge – on how our view of the world changes (typically) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains. One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate, state of affairs. One factor may be that while belief revision theory has traditionally been pursued in a bottom- up manner, focusing on the endeavors of single inquirers, philosophers of science, inspired by logical empiricism, have tended to be more interested in science as a multi-agent or agent-independent phenomenon.

Related Products