logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Do Animals Have Rights Alison Hills

  • SKU: BELL-1470098
Do Animals Have Rights Alison Hills
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

60 reviews

Do Animals Have Rights Alison Hills instant download after payment.

Publisher: Totem Books
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.07 MB
Pages: 257
Author: Alison Hills
ISBN: 9781840466232, 9781840468182, 1840466235, 1840468181
Language: English
Year: 2002

Product desciption

Do Animals Have Rights Alison Hills by Alison Hills 9781840466232, 9781840468182, 1840466235, 1840468181 instant download after payment.

This book basically takes a rather sophisticated college course on Animal Rights and summarizes it for popular consumption. The book is very thorough and clear. The author takes a moderate position on animal ethics. Animals have moral status, for which reason we ought to change our treatment of them significantly. But animals are different, so their lives are worth less and they don't have any rights. Some of her points are made too quickly to be convincing. For example, the sheer fact that humans can give and withhold consent is presented as the whole basis of their having rights, on some pages. On other pages a social contract approach to rights is taken. The tone of the book is clinical and detached, never personal or passionate. The author pronounces what is right and wrong, reasonable and unreasonable, as if from the the throne of reason. As a result, this is not a really engaging read, but if you want to know what the current debate about animals among philosophers looks like, this book will give you a very good idea.

Related Products