logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Evidentialism And The Will To Believe Scott F Aikin

  • SKU: BELL-50229184
Evidentialism And The Will To Believe Scott F Aikin
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

96 reviews

Evidentialism And The Will To Believe Scott F Aikin instant download after payment.

Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.77 MB
Author: Scott F. Aikin
ISBN: 9781623560171, 9781472594105, 1623560179, 147259410X
Language: English
Year: 2014

Product desciption

Evidentialism And The Will To Believe Scott F Aikin by Scott F. Aikin 9781623560171, 9781472594105, 1623560179, 147259410X instant download after payment.

Work on the norms of belief in epistemology regularly starts with two touchstone essays: W.K. Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” and William James’s “The Will to Believe.” Discussing the central themes from these seminal essays, Evidentialism and the Will to Believe explores the history of the ideas governing evidentialism.
As well as Clifford’s argument from the examples of the shipowner, the consequences of credulity and his defence against skepticism, this book tackles James’s conditions for a genuine option and the structure of the will to believe case as a counter-example to Clifford’s evidentialism. Exploring the question of whether James’s case successfully counters Clifford’s evidentialist rule for belief, this study captures the debate between those who hold that one should proportion belief to evidence and those who hold that the evidentialist norm is too restrictive.
More than a sustained explication of the essays, it also surveys recent epistemological arguments to evidentialism. But it is by bringing Clifford and James into fruitful conversation for the first time that this study presents a clearer history of the issues and provides an important reconstruction of the notion of evidence in contemporary epistemology.

Related Products