EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Existential Inertia And The Five Ways Edward Feser

Name: Existential Inertia And The Five Ways Edward Feser
SKU: BELL-33291130
Price: 31.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.4 (72 reviews)

SKU: BELL-33291130

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

4.4

72 reviews

Existential Inertia And The Five Ways Edward Feser instant download after payment.

Publisher: American Catholic Philosophical Association

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.19 MB

Author: Edward Feser

Language: English

Year: 2011

Volume: 85, Issue 2

Product desciption

Existential Inertia And The Five Ways Edward Feser by Edward Feser instant download after payment.

The “existential inertia” thesis holds that, once in existence, the natural world tends to remain in existence without need of a divine conserving cause. Critics of the doctrine of divine conservation often allege that its defenders have not provided arguments in favor of it and against the rival doctrine of existential inertia. But in fact, when properly understood, the traditional theistic arguments summed up in Aquinas’s Five Ways can themselves be seen to be (or at least to imply) arguments against existential inertia and in favor of divine conservation. Moreover, they are challenging arguments, to which defenders of the existential inertia thesis have yet seriously to respond