logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Factfinding Without Facts The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions 1st Edition Nancy A Combs

  • SKU: BELL-2149120
Factfinding Without Facts The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions 1st Edition Nancy A Combs
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

0.0

0 reviews

Factfinding Without Facts The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions 1st Edition Nancy A Combs instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 2.1 MB
Pages: 434
Author: Nancy A. Combs
ISBN: 0521111153
Language: English
Year: 2010
Edition: 1

Product desciption

Factfinding Without Facts The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions 1st Edition Nancy A Combs by Nancy A. Combs 0521111153 instant download after payment.

Fact-finding Without Facts explores international criminal fact-finding - empirically, conceptually, and normatively. After reviewing thousands of pages of transcripts from various international criminal tribunals, the author reveals that international criminal trials are beset by numerous and severe fact-finding impediments that substantially impair the tribunals' ability to determine who did what to whom. These fact-finding impediments have heretofore received virtually no publicity, let alone scholarly treatment, and they are deeply troubling not only because they raise grave concerns about the accuracy of the judgments currently being issued but because they can be expected to similarly impair the next generation of international trials that will be held at the International Criminal Court. After setting forth her empirical findings, the author considers their conceptual and normative implications. The author concludes that international criminal tribunals purport a fact-finding competence that they do not possess, and as a consequence, base their judgments on a less precise, more amorphous method of fact-finding than they publicly acknowledge. The book ends with an exploration of various normative questions, including the most foundational: whether the international tribunals' fact-finding impediments fatally undermine the international criminal justice project.

Related Products