EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Japans Siting Process For The Geological Disposal Of Highlevel Radioactive Waste An International Peer Review Oecd

SKU: BELL-6823162

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

0.0

0 reviews

Japans Siting Process For The Geological Disposal Of Highlevel Radioactive Waste An International Peer Review Oecd instant download after payment.

Publisher: OECD/NEA

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.23 MB

Pages: 45

Author: OECD

ISBN: 9789264265035, 9264265031

Language: English

Year: 2016

Product desciption

Japans Siting Process For The Geological Disposal Of Highlevel Radioactive Waste An International Peer Review Oecd by Oecd 9789264265035, 9264265031 instant download after payment.

The Nuclear Energy Agency carried out an independent peer review of Japanâ€™s siting process and criteria for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in May 2016. The review concluded that Japanâ€™s site screening process is generally in accordance with international practices. As the goal of the siting process is to locate a site â€" that is both appropriate and accepted by the community â€" to host a geological disposal facility for high-level radioactive waste, the international review team emphasises in this report the importance of maintaining an open dialogue and interaction between the regulator, the implementer and the public. Dialogue should begin in the early phases and continue throughout the siting process. The international review team also underlines the importance of taking into account feasibility aspects when selecting a site for preliminary investigations, but suggests that it would be inappropriate to set detailed scientific criteria for nationwide screening at this stage. The team has provided extensive advisory remarks in the report as opportunities for improvement, including the recommendation to use clear and consistent terminology in defining the site screening criteria as it is a critical factor in a successful siting process.