logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Judicial Power And Strategic Communication In Mexico 1st Edition Jeffrey K Staton

  • SKU: BELL-1643564
Judicial Power And Strategic Communication In Mexico 1st Edition Jeffrey K Staton
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

86 reviews

Judicial Power And Strategic Communication In Mexico 1st Edition Jeffrey K Staton instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.33 MB
Pages: 236
Author: Jeffrey K. Staton
ISBN: 9780521195218, 0521195217
Language: English
Year: 2010
Edition: 1

Product desciption

Judicial Power And Strategic Communication In Mexico 1st Edition Jeffrey K Staton by Jeffrey K. Staton 9780521195218, 0521195217 instant download after payment.

Although they are not directly accountable to voters, constitutional court judges around the world nevertheless communicate with the general public through the media. In Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico, Jeffrey K. Staton argues that constitutional courts develop public relations strategies in order to increase the transparency of judicial behavior and promote judicial legitimacy - two conditions that are favorable for the exercise of independent judicial power. Yet, in some political contexts there can be a tension between transparency and legitimacy, and for this reason, courts cannot necessarily advance both conditions simultaneously. The argument is tested via an analysis of the Mexican Supreme Court during Mexico's recent transition to democracy, and also through a cross-national analysis of public perceptions of judicial legitimacy. The results demonstrate that judges can be active participants in the construction of their own power. More broadly, the study develops a positive political theory of institutions, which highlights the connections between democratization and the rule of law.

Related Products