logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Just Prospering Plato And The Sophistic Debate About Justice Merrick Anderson

  • SKU: BELL-58668412
Just Prospering Plato And The Sophistic Debate About Justice Merrick Anderson
$ 35.00 $ 45.00 (-22%)

4.8

14 reviews

Just Prospering Plato And The Sophistic Debate About Justice Merrick Anderson instant download after payment.

Publisher: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.28 MB
Pages: 236
Author: Merrick Anderson
ISBN: 9780198922575, 9780197267660, 9780198922568, 9780198922582, 0198922574, 0197267661, 0198922566, 0198922582
Language: English
Year: 2024

Product desciption

Just Prospering Plato And The Sophistic Debate About Justice Merrick Anderson by Merrick Anderson 9780198922575, 9780197267660, 9780198922568, 9780198922582, 0198922574, 0197267661, 0198922566, 0198922582 instant download after payment.

Just Prospering? Plato and the Sophistic Debate about Justice introduces new research about the first secular discussions concerning the value of justice from the Western Tradition. In Part I, Anderson addresses the debates of the sophists, a group of politically minded intellectuals from the 5th Century BCE, considering relevant extant texts to produce the following conclusion: some of the sophists argued that being just was bad for the just individual, and that an individual would do well to be unjust instead, whereas others took it upon themselves to defend justice by arguing that the just life was best. Anderson continues in Part II to demonstrate that Plato, writing in the 4th Century, was aware of this debate and wanted to settle the matter himself. In his Republic, one of the great philosophical treatises of all time, he revives the earlier dialogue of the sophists to argue that the just life is the best life for human beings.


Related Products