logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Linguistic Purism In Action How Auxiliary Tun Was Stigmatized In Early New High German Nils Langer

  • SKU: BELL-5563478
Linguistic Purism In Action How Auxiliary Tun Was Stigmatized In Early New High German Nils Langer
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

50 reviews

Linguistic Purism In Action How Auxiliary Tun Was Stigmatized In Early New High German Nils Langer instant download after payment.

Publisher: De Gruyter
File Extension: PDF
File size: 9.3 MB
Pages: 324
Author: Nils Langer
ISBN: 9783110170245, 3110170248
Language: English
Year: 2001

Product desciption

Linguistic Purism In Action How Auxiliary Tun Was Stigmatized In Early New High German Nils Langer by Nils Langer 9783110170245, 3110170248 instant download after payment.

The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.

Related Products