logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Majority Rule Or Minority Will Adherence To Precedent On The Us Supreme Court 1st Edition Harold J Spaeth

  • SKU: BELL-1928892
Majority Rule Or Minority Will Adherence To Precedent On The Us Supreme Court 1st Edition Harold J Spaeth
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.8

54 reviews

Majority Rule Or Minority Will Adherence To Precedent On The Us Supreme Court 1st Edition Harold J Spaeth instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 8.71 MB
Pages: 357
Author: Harold J. Spaeth, Jeffrey A. Segal
ISBN: 9780521624244, 9780521805711, 052162424X, 0521805716
Language: English
Year: 2001
Edition: 1

Product desciption

Majority Rule Or Minority Will Adherence To Precedent On The Us Supreme Court 1st Edition Harold J Spaeth by Harold J. Spaeth, Jeffrey A. Segal 9780521624244, 9780521805711, 052162424X, 0521805716 instant download after payment.

This book examines the influence of precedent on the behavior of the US Supreme Court justices throughout the Court's history. Supreme Court justices almost always "follow" precedent, in that they always cite precedents for the positions they take. Because there are always precedents on either side of a case for justices to follow, following precedent does not mean that the justices are ever influenced by precedent. Employing the assumption that for precedent to be an influence on the behavior of justices, it must lead to a result they would not otherwise have reached, the authors show that precedent rarely controls the justices' votes.

Related Products