logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Miranda V Arizona Great Supreme Court Decisions 1st Edition Larry A Vanmeter

  • SKU: BELL-1675110
Miranda V Arizona Great Supreme Court Decisions 1st Edition Larry A Vanmeter
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.4

62 reviews

Miranda V Arizona Great Supreme Court Decisions 1st Edition Larry A Vanmeter instant download after payment.

Publisher: Chelsea House Pub
File Extension: PDF
File size: 2.36 MB
Pages: 112
Author: Larry A. Vanmeter
ISBN: 9780791092590, 9781438103396, 0791092593, 1438103395
Language: English
Year: 2006
Edition: 1

Product desciption

Miranda V Arizona Great Supreme Court Decisions 1st Edition Larry A Vanmeter by Larry A. Vanmeter 9780791092590, 9781438103396, 0791092593, 1438103395 instant download after payment.

“You have the right to remain silent” is the well-known introduction to a series of statements police are required to communicate to accused criminals upon arrest. Known as the Miranda warning, these famous instructions are a direct result of the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda, an Arizona laborer, was arrested in 1963 and convicted of raping a woman. He appealed his conviction and the Supreme Court overturned the decision, determining that Arizona authorities had violated two constitutional amendments. Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused offers a clear understanding of the history of this decision and its consequences. Before the Miranda warning, it was not uncommon for police station confessions to be obtained by intimidation, making false promises, psychological game-playing, physical torture, or exploiting the ignorance of the accused. The Supreme Court’s decision allowed that the privileges granted to a defendant in a courtroom—the right to counsel, the right to due process, and the right to not witness against oneself—were now extended to the police station.

Related Products