logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Motivation Ethics Mathew Coakley

  • SKU: BELL-50234948
Motivation Ethics Mathew Coakley
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.1

80 reviews

Motivation Ethics Mathew Coakley instant download after payment.

Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.49 MB
Author: MATHEW COAKLEY
ISBN: 9781350004580, 9781350004597, 9781350004610, 1350004588, 1350004596, 1350004618
Language: English
Year: 2017

Product desciption

Motivation Ethics Mathew Coakley by Mathew Coakley 9781350004580, 9781350004597, 9781350004610, 1350004588, 1350004596, 1350004618 instant download after payment.

This is a book about a particular moral theory – motivation ethics – and why we should accept it. But it is also a book about moral theorizing, about how we might compare different structures of moral theory.
In principle we might morally evaluate a range of objects: we might, for iexample, evaluate what people do – is some action right, wrong, permitted, forbidden, a duty or beyond what is required? Or we might evaluate agents: what is it to be morally heroic, or morally depraved, or highly moral? And, we could evaluate institutions: which ones are just, or morally better, or legitimate?
Most theories focus on one (or two) of these and offer arguments against rivals. What this book does is to step back and ask a different question: of the theories that evaluate one object, are they compatible with an acceptable account of the evaluation of the other objects?
So, for instance, if a moral theory tells us which actions are right and wrong, well can it then be compatible with a theory of what it is to be a morally good or bad or heroic or depraved agent (or deny the need for this)? It seems that this would be an easy task, but the book sets out how this is very difficult for some of our most prominent theories, why this is so, and why a theory based on motivations might be the right answer.

Related Products