logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

National Security In The Courts The Need For Secrecy Vs The Requirement Of Transparency 1st Edition Derigan Almond Silver

  • SKU: BELL-51238444
National Security In The Courts The Need For Secrecy Vs The Requirement Of Transparency 1st Edition Derigan Almond Silver
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

26 reviews

National Security In The Courts The Need For Secrecy Vs The Requirement Of Transparency 1st Edition Derigan Almond Silver instant download after payment.

Publisher: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.33 MB
Pages: 273
Author: Derigan Almond Silver
ISBN: 9781593326548, 1593326548
Language: English
Year: 2010
Edition: 1

Product desciption

National Security In The Courts The Need For Secrecy Vs The Requirement Of Transparency 1st Edition Derigan Almond Silver by Derigan Almond Silver 9781593326548, 1593326548 instant download after payment.

Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal analysis while ignoring others gives the judges the flexibility to mold la regarding national security information.

Related Products