logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

New Thinking About Propositions Jeffrey C King Scott Soames

  • SKU: BELL-4671314
New Thinking About Propositions Jeffrey C King Scott Soames
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.7

66 reviews

New Thinking About Propositions Jeffrey C King Scott Soames instant download after payment.

Publisher: Oxford University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 5.23 MB
Pages: 252
Author: Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, Jeff Speaks
ISBN: 9780199693764, 0199693765
Language: English
Year: 2014

Product desciption

New Thinking About Propositions Jeffrey C King Scott Soames by Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, Jeff Speaks 9780199693764, 0199693765 instant download after payment.

Philosophy (especially philosophy of language and philosophy of mind), science (especially linguistics and cognitive science), and common sense all sometimes make reference to propositions--understood as the things we believe and say, and the things which are (primarily) true or false. There is, however, no widespread agreement about what sorts of things these entities are. In New Thinking about Propositions, Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, and Jeff Speaks argue that commitment to propositions is indispensable, and that traditional accounts of propositions are inadequate. They each then defend their own views of the nature of propositions.

Related Products