EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Oral Argument And Amicus Curiae 1st Edition Matthew Mc Roberts

Name: Oral Argument And Amicus Curiae 1st Edition Matthew Mc Roberts
SKU: BELL-51238424
Price: 31.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4 (16 reviews)

SKU: BELL-51238424

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

4.0

16 reviews

Oral Argument And Amicus Curiae 1st Edition Matthew Mc Roberts instant download after payment.

Publisher: Lfb Scholarly Pub Llc

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.38 MB

Pages: 170

Author: Matthew M.C. Roberts

ISBN: 9781593325046, 9781593324667, 1593325045, 1593324669

Language: English

Year: 2012

Edition: 1

Product desciption

Oral Argument And Amicus Curiae 1st Edition Matthew Mc Roberts by Matthew M.c. Roberts 9781593325046, 9781593324667, 1593325045, 1593324669 instant download after payment.

Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court’s life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices’ behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics.