logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Precedent And Statute Lawmaking In The Courts Versus Lawmaking In Parliament 1st Ed Orlin Yalnazov

  • SKU: BELL-7326960
Precedent And Statute Lawmaking In The Courts Versus Lawmaking In Parliament 1st Ed Orlin Yalnazov
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

0.0

0 reviews

Precedent And Statute Lawmaking In The Courts Versus Lawmaking In Parliament 1st Ed Orlin Yalnazov instant download after payment.

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden,Springer Gabler
File Extension: PDF
File size: 3.28 MB
Author: Orlin Yalnazov
ISBN: 9783658243845, 9783658243852, 3658243848, 3658243856
Language: English
Year: 2018
Edition: 1st ed.

Product desciption

Precedent And Statute Lawmaking In The Courts Versus Lawmaking In Parliament 1st Ed Orlin Yalnazov by Orlin Yalnazov 9783658243845, 9783658243852, 3658243848, 3658243856 instant download after payment.

Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The ‘technologies’ between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the ‘efficiency of the common law’ hypothesis.

Related Products