logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Proportional Liability Analytical And Comparative Perspectives Israel Gilead

  • SKU: BELL-50966696
Proportional Liability Analytical And Comparative Perspectives Israel Gilead
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

58 reviews

Proportional Liability Analytical And Comparative Perspectives Israel Gilead instant download after payment.

Publisher: Walter de Gruyter
File Extension: PDF
File size: 3.22 MB
Pages: 396
Author: Israel Gilead, Michael D. Green, Bernhard A. Koch
ISBN: 9783110282580, 3110282585
Language: English
Year: 2013

Product desciption

Proportional Liability Analytical And Comparative Perspectives Israel Gilead by Israel Gilead, Michael D. Green, Bernhard A. Koch 9783110282580, 3110282585 instant download after payment.

Causal uncertainty is a wide-spread phenomenon. Courts are often unable to determine whether a defendant’s tortious conduct was a factual cause of a plaintiff’s harm.

Yet, sometimes courts can determine the probability that the defendant caused the plaintiff’s harm, although often there is considerable variance in the probability estimate based on the available evidence. The conventional way to cope with this uncertainty has been to apply the evidentiary rule of ‘standard of proof’.


The application of this ‘all or nothing’ rule can lead to unfairness by absolving defendants who acted tortiously and may also create undesirable incentives that result in greater wrongful conduct and injustice to victims. Some courts have decided that this ‘no-liability’ outcome is undesirable. They have adopted rules of proportional liability that compensate plaintiffs according to the probability that their harm was caused by the defendant’s tortious conduct.

In 2005 the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) made a breakthrough in this regard by embracing rules of proportional liability. This project, building on PETL, endeavours to make further inquiries into the desirable scope of proportional liability and to offer a more detailed view of its meaning, implications, and ramifications.

Related Products