EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Psychopolitics Of Speech Uncivil Discourse And The Excess Of Desire James Martin

SKU: BELL-10018020

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

0 reviews

Psychopolitics Of Speech Uncivil Discourse And The Excess Of Desire James Martin instant download after payment.

Publisher: Transcipt Verlag

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.16 MB

Pages: 187

Author: James Martin

ISBN: 9783839439197, 3839439191

Language: English

Year: 2019

Product desciption

Psychopolitics Of Speech Uncivil Discourse And The Excess Of Desire James Martin by James Martin 9783839439197, 3839439191 instant download after payment.

The human capacity for speech is forever celebrated as evidence of its innate civility. Why, then, is public discourse often - and today more than ever, it would seem - so uncivil, even delusional? The reason, argues James Martin in this timely book, lies in the way speech works to organise desire. More than knowledge or rational interests, public speech services an unconscious urge for a lost enjoyment, stimulating an excess in subjectivity that moves us in body and mind.Martin draws upon the work of psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan as well as other Continental thinkers to set out a new approach to the analysis of rhetoric and answer the troubling question of whether civil discourse can ever hope to escape its obscene underside.