logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Public Space In Transition Coproduction And Comanagement Of Privately Owned Public Space In Seoul And Berlin Dahae Lee

  • SKU: BELL-51813036
Public Space In Transition Coproduction And Comanagement Of Privately Owned Public Space In Seoul And Berlin Dahae Lee
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

28 reviews

Public Space In Transition Coproduction And Comanagement Of Privately Owned Public Space In Seoul And Berlin Dahae Lee instant download after payment.

Publisher: transcript Verlag
File Extension: PDF
File size: 22.41 MB
Pages: 202
Author: Dahae Lee
ISBN: 9783839462324, 3839462320
Language: English
Year: 2022

Product desciption

Public Space In Transition Coproduction And Comanagement Of Privately Owned Public Space In Seoul And Berlin Dahae Lee by Dahae Lee 9783839462324, 3839462320 instant download after payment.

Teheran-ro in Seoul and Mediaspree area in Berlin are pristine examples for public spaces with a history of rapid change in the context of broader political and economic transitions. Dahae Lee shows that in such a transitional context, the public sector alone is incapable to provide and manage public space. Hence, it engages private sector entities in the form of privately owned public space/s (POPS). By analysing the planning instruments used for POPS in both cases, their uniqueness as well as strengths and weaknesses are revealed. Based on the results this study offers a number of policy recommendations for cities that encounter similar problems.

Related Products