EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Rational Choice Using Imprecise Probabilities And Utilities Paul Weirich

Name: Rational Choice Using Imprecise Probabilities And Utilities Paul Weirich
SKU: BELL-34355156
Price: 31.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 5 (88 reviews)

SKU: BELL-34355156

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

5.0

88 reviews

Rational Choice Using Imprecise Probabilities And Utilities Paul Weirich instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.02 MB

Pages: 82

Author: Paul Weirich

ISBN: 9781108713504, 1108713505

Language: English

Year: 2021

Product desciption

Rational Choice Using Imprecise Probabilities And Utilities Paul Weirich by Paul Weirich 9781108713504, 1108713505 instant download after payment.

An agent often does not have precise probabilities or utilities to guide resolution of a decision problem. I advance a principle of rationality for making decisions in such cases. To begin, I represent the doxastic and conative state of an agent with a set of pairs of a probability assignment and a utility assignment. Then I support a decision principle that allows any act that maximizes expected utility according to some pair of assignments in the set. Assuming that computation of an option's expected utility uses comprehensive possible outcomes that include the option's risk, no consideration supports a stricter requirement.