Reforming The Presidential Nomination Process Steven S Smith Thomas E Patterson Melanie J Springer Melanie J Springer Kathleen Hall Jamieson Larry J Sabato Thomas E Mann Daniel H Lowenstein James L Gibson Bruce W Hardy by Steven S. Smith; Thomas E. Patterson; Melanie J. Springer; Melanie J. Springer; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Larry J. Sabato; Thomas E. Mann; Daniel H. Lowenstein; James L. Gibson; Bruce W. Hardy 9780815703495, 081570349X instant download after payment.

The 2008 U.S. presidential campaign has provided a lifetimeOCOs worth of surprises. Once again, however, the nomination process highlighted the importance of organization, political prowess, timing, and money. And once again, it raised many hackles. The Democratic contest in particular generated many complaintsOCofor example, it started too early, it was too long, and Super Tuesday was overloaded. This timely book synthesizes new analysis by premier political scientists into a cohesive look at the presidential nomination processOCothe ways in which it is broken and how it might be fixed.The contributors to Reforming the Presidential Nomination Process address different facets of the selection process, starting with a brief history of how we got to this point. They analyze the importanceOCoand perceived unfairnessOCoof the earliest primaries and discuss what led to record turnouts in 2008. What roles do media coverage and public endorsements play? William Mayer explains the OC superdelegateOCO phenomenon and the controversy surrounding it; James Gibson and Melanie Springer evaluate public perceptions of the current process as well as possible reforms. Larry Sabato (A More Perfect Constitution) calls for a new nomination system, installed via constitutionalamendment, while Tom Mann of Brookings opines on calls for reform that arose in 2008 and Daniel Lowenstein examines the process by which reforms may be adoptedOCoor blocked