Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.
Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq
We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.
For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.
EbookBell Team
5.0
48 reviewsPreface
This is a book of first-hand research. As a reporter for CBC News, I covered this case from the day Richard Oland’s body was discovered. I attended press conferences, jury selection, numerous court proceedings, & the entire trial, which I live-blogged. I’ve conducted interviews & combed through legal documents, financial records, & scientific reports. On occasion in the pages that follow, I draw from the work of other media or secondary sources, & I cite them when I do. Although I made every effort to speak to a member of the Oland family about the case, to my regret they declined to participate in this book. They have said that they will comment publicly only after the appeal.
Speech is reported substantially verbatim: most stumbles, repetitions, self-corrections, & verbal tics have been edited out. The result, I believe, accurately captures individual speech style without sacrificing readability. When quoting from emails & texts, a similar approach is used. I’ve quietly corrected obvious typos rather than repeatedly (& pedantically) adding sic. Words enclosed in square brackets are additions I’ve made for clarity.
For this book, I’ve eschewed a strictly chronological account of the trial in favour of a thematic approach that pulls together testimony from different witnesses at different times to provide coherent accounts of particular evidence & issues.