logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Image The Depths And The Surface Multivalent Approaches To Biblical Study Jsot Supplement Susan Gillingham

  • SKU: BELL-1996578
The Image The Depths And The Surface Multivalent Approaches To Biblical Study Jsot Supplement Susan Gillingham
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

100 reviews

The Image The Depths And The Surface Multivalent Approaches To Biblical Study Jsot Supplement Susan Gillingham instant download after payment.

Publisher: Sheffield Academic Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 8.32 MB
Pages: 159
Author: Susan Gillingham
ISBN: 9781841272979, 1841272973
Language: English
Year: 2002

Product desciption

The Image The Depths And The Surface Multivalent Approaches To Biblical Study Jsot Supplement Susan Gillingham by Susan Gillingham 9781841272979, 1841272973 instant download after payment.

The purpose of this book is to illustrate that reading is a subjective process which results in multivalent interpretations. This is the case whether one looks at a text in its historical contexts (the diachronic approach) or its literary contexts (the synchronic approach). Three representative biblical texts are chosen: from the Law (Genesis 2-3), the Writings (Isaiah 23) and the Prophets (Amos 5), and each is read first by way of historical analysis and then by literary analysis. Each text provides a number of variant interpretations and raises the question, is any one interpretation superior? What criteria do we use to measure this? Or is there value in the complementary nature of many approaches and many results?

Related Products