logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Limits Of Legal Reasoning And The European Court Of Justice Gerard Conway

  • SKU: BELL-5154554
The Limits Of Legal Reasoning And The European Court Of Justice Gerard Conway
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.7

86 reviews

The Limits Of Legal Reasoning And The European Court Of Justice Gerard Conway instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 2.34 MB
Pages: 344
Author: Gerard Conway
ISBN: 9781107001398, 1107001390
Language: English
Year: 2012

Product desciption

The Limits Of Legal Reasoning And The European Court Of Justice Gerard Conway by Gerard Conway 9781107001398, 1107001390 instant download after payment.

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

Related Products