EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link: https://ebookbell.com/faq

We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.

For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Notion Of Ditthi In Theravada Buddhism The Point Of View 1st Edition Paul Fuller

Name: The Notion Of Ditthi In Theravada Buddhism The Point Of View 1st Edition Paul Fuller
SKU: BELL-1643116
Price: 31.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 5 (68 reviews)

SKU: BELL-1643116

$ 31.00 ~~$ 45.00~~ (-31%)

5.0

68 reviews

The Notion Of Ditthi In Theravada Buddhism The Point Of View 1st Edition Paul Fuller instant download after payment.

Publisher: Routledge

File Extension: PDF

File size: 1.67 MB

Pages: 264

Author: Paul Fuller

ISBN: 9780203010433, 9780415342933, 0203010434, 0415342937

Language: English

Year: 2005

Edition: 1

Product desciption

The Notion Of Ditthi In Theravada Buddhism The Point Of View 1st Edition Paul Fuller by Paul Fuller 9780203010433, 9780415342933, 0203010434, 0415342937 instant download after payment.

The notion of 'view' or 'opinion' (ditthi) as an obstacle to 'seeing things as they are' is a central concept in Buddhist thought. This book considers the two ways in which the notion of views are usually understood. Are we to understand right-view as a correction of wrong-views (the opposition understanding) or is the aim of the Buddhist path the overcoming of all views, even right-view (the no-views understanding)? The author argues that neither approach is correct. Instead he suggests that the early texts do not understand right-view as a correction of wrong-view, but as a detached order of seeing, completely different from the attitude of holding to any view, wrong or right.