logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Role Of Domestic Courts In Treaty Enforcement A Comparative Study David Sloss

  • SKU: BELL-2012544
The Role Of Domestic Courts In Treaty Enforcement A Comparative Study David Sloss
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.0

76 reviews

The Role Of Domestic Courts In Treaty Enforcement A Comparative Study David Sloss instant download after payment.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 2.68 MB
Pages: 655
Author: David Sloss
ISBN: 9780511635458, 9780521877305, 0511635451, 052187730X
Language: English
Year: 2009

Product desciption

The Role Of Domestic Courts In Treaty Enforcement A Comparative Study David Sloss by David Sloss 9780511635458, 9780521877305, 0511635451, 052187730X instant download after payment.

This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. U.S. courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order.

Related Products