logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Role Of Legal Argumentation And Human Dignity In Constitutional Courts Proceedings Of The Special Workshops Held At The 28th World Congress Of Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte Giovanni Damele

  • SKU: BELL-10867214
The Role Of Legal Argumentation And Human Dignity In Constitutional Courts Proceedings Of The Special Workshops Held At The 28th World Congress Of Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte Giovanni Damele
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.7

16 reviews

The Role Of Legal Argumentation And Human Dignity In Constitutional Courts Proceedings Of The Special Workshops Held At The 28th World Congress Of Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte Giovanni Damele instant download after payment.

Publisher: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH
File Extension: PDF
File size: 2.23 MB
Pages: 239
Author: Giovanni Damele
ISBN: 9783515122351, 3515122354
Language: English
Year: 2019

Product desciption

The Role Of Legal Argumentation And Human Dignity In Constitutional Courts Proceedings Of The Special Workshops Held At The 28th World Congress Of Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte Giovanni Damele by Giovanni Damele 9783515122351, 3515122354 instant download after payment.

The legal argumentation of constitutional courts, for instance on human dignity, has been in the centre of interest both from theoretical and practical perspectives. This book addresses the role of legal argumentation at first in general, covering empirical and comparative perspectives on constitutional argumentative practices. It also comprises a comparative assessment of constitutional argumentation versus the arguments deployed by other courts as well as by decision-makers. Secondly, the book focuses on how constitutional courts reason with human dignity. This concept takes many different shapes, though very rarely in an objective fashion. It is embedded in several western constitutions, although constitutional courts and scholars tend to disagree on its meaning and content. Finally, the book aims to shed light on the controversial topic of human dignity from a normative and philosophical perspective.

Related Products