logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

The Supreme Court And Election Law Judging Equality From Baker V Carr To Bush V Gore Richard Hasen

  • SKU: BELL-51760476
The Supreme Court And Election Law Judging Equality From Baker V Carr To Bush V Gore Richard Hasen
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

5.0

48 reviews

The Supreme Court And Election Law Judging Equality From Baker V Carr To Bush V Gore Richard Hasen instant download after payment.

Publisher: New York University Press
File Extension: PDF
File size: 76.71 MB
Author: Richard Hasen
ISBN: 9780814744536, 0814744532
Language: English
Year: 2006

Product desciption

The Supreme Court And Election Law Judging Equality From Baker V Carr To Bush V Gore Richard Hasen by Richard Hasen 9780814744536, 0814744532 instant download after payment.

In the first comprehensive study of election law since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, Richard L. Hasen rethinks the Court’s role in regulating elections. Drawing on the case files of the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, Hasen roots the Court’s intervention in political process cases to the landmark 1962 case, Baker v. Carr. The case opened the courts to a variety of election law disputes, to the point that the courts now control and direct major aspects of the American electoral process.
The Supreme Court does have a crucial role to play in protecting a socially constructed “core” of political equality principles, contends Hasen, but it should leave contested questions of political equality to the political process itself. Under this standard, many of the Court’s most important election law cases from Baker to Bush have been wrongly decided.

Related Products