logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Inconsistency In Science Joke Meheus Ed

  • SKU: BELL-4384572
Inconsistency In Science Joke Meheus Ed
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.8

94 reviews

Inconsistency In Science Joke Meheus Ed instant download after payment.

Publisher: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
File Extension: PDF
File size: 24.34 MB
Pages: 225
Author: Joke Meheus (ed.)
ISBN: 9789048160235, 9789401700856, 9048160235, 9401700850
Language: English
Year: 2002

Product desciption

Inconsistency In Science Joke Meheus Ed by Joke Meheus (ed.) 9789048160235, 9789401700856, 9048160235, 9401700850 instant download after payment.

For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How is `logical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent theories be considered as true?
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.

Related Products