logo

EbookBell.com

Most ebook files are in PDF format, so you can easily read them using various software such as Foxit Reader or directly on the Google Chrome browser.
Some ebook files are released by publishers in other formats such as .awz, .mobi, .epub, .fb2, etc. You may need to install specific software to read these formats on mobile/PC, such as Calibre.

Please read the tutorial at this link:  https://ebookbell.com/faq 


We offer FREE conversion to the popular formats you request; however, this may take some time. Therefore, right after payment, please email us, and we will try to provide the service as quickly as possible.


For some exceptional file formats or broken links (if any), please refrain from opening any disputes. Instead, email us first, and we will try to assist within a maximum of 6 hours.

EbookBell Team

Legal Argumentation And Evidence Douglas N Walton

  • SKU: BELL-1803414
Legal Argumentation And Evidence Douglas N Walton
$ 31.00 $ 45.00 (-31%)

4.7

16 reviews

Legal Argumentation And Evidence Douglas N Walton instant download after payment.

Publisher: Pennsylvania State Univ Pr (Txt)
File Extension: PDF
File size: 1.67 MB
Pages: 374
Author: Douglas N. Walton
ISBN: 9780271021775, 0271021772
Language: English
Year: 2002

Product desciption

Legal Argumentation And Evidence Douglas N Walton by Douglas N. Walton 9780271021775, 0271021772 instant download after payment.

A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument.In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton s aim is to provide a more expansive view of what can be considered "reasonable" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic, rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than truth.

Related Products